↓ Skip to main content

Hypermethylation in the ZBTB20 gene is associated with major depressive disorder

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
34 X users
weibo
16 weibo users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
89 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hypermethylation in the ZBTB20 gene is associated with major depressive disorder
Published in
Genome Biology, April 2014
DOI 10.1186/gb-2014-15-4-r56
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthew N Davies, Lutz Krause, Jordana T Bell, Fei Gao, Kirsten J Ward, Honglong Wu, Hanlin Lu, Yuan Liu, Pei-Chein Tsai, David A Collier, Therese Murphy, Emma Dempster, Jonathan Mill, UK Brain Expression Consortium, Alexis Battle, Sara Mostafavi, Xiaowei Zhu, Anjali Henders, Enda Byrne, Naomi R Wray, Nicholas G Martin, Tim D Spector, Jun Wang

Abstract

Although genetic variation is believed to contribute to an individual's susceptibility to major depressive disorder, genome-wide association studies have not yet identified associations that could explain the full etiology of the disease. Epigenetics is increasingly believed to play a major role in the development of common clinical phenotypes, including major depressive disorder.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Luxembourg 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 134 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 21 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 14%
Student > Master 17 12%
Researcher 15 11%
Student > Postgraduate 8 6%
Other 21 15%
Unknown 36 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 12%
Psychology 9 7%
Neuroscience 8 6%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 39 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2022.
All research outputs
#871,222
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#587
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,250
of 238,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#11
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,765 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.