↓ Skip to main content

Emerging Therapies for Chronic Migraine

Overview of attention for article published in Current Pain and Headache Reports, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
Title
Emerging Therapies for Chronic Migraine
Published in
Current Pain and Headache Reports, February 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11916-014-0408-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alberto Proietti Cecchini, Licia Grazzi

Abstract

Not all chronic migraines are medication-overuse headaches and so the challenge is how to treat them. Currently available pharmacological therapies may be ineffective or they are abandoned because of intolerable side effects. There is still much room for novel therapeutic approaches in those with drug refractory migraine (RM). Occipital nerve stimulation (ONS) and botulinum toxin type A have finally gained a level of evidence based on the results of RCTs and pooled analysis, which by and large have shown at least a modest but valuable therapeutic effect. For a long time, these two approaches were only supported by clinical experience and open-label studies. Considering the disabling nature of migraine disorder, the large prevalence and serious impact on health-related quality of life and health care costs, any degree of response to treatment is acceptable and welcomed by the patient. An important issues for future studies would be better patient selection when finding candidates for each procedure.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 54 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Other 5 9%
Researcher 5 9%
Other 13 23%
Unknown 14 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 39%
Neuroscience 5 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Psychology 2 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 17 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2014.
All research outputs
#18,369,403
of 22,751,628 outputs
Outputs from Current Pain and Headache Reports
#665
of 799 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#233,891
of 313,461 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Pain and Headache Reports
#17
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,751,628 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 799 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,461 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.