↓ Skip to main content

The sharpest tool in the shed: IPO financial statement management of STEM vs. non-STEM firms

Overview of attention for article published in Review of Accounting Studies, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
Title
The sharpest tool in the shed: IPO financial statement management of STEM vs. non-STEM firms
Published in
Review of Accounting Studies, July 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11142-017-9412-4
Authors

Tatiana Fedyk, Zvi Singer, Mark Soliman

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 87 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 13%
Student > Master 9 10%
Researcher 7 8%
Professor 6 7%
Other 15 17%
Unknown 24 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 37 43%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 16 18%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Unspecified 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 24 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2017.
All research outputs
#17,906,525
of 22,990,068 outputs
Outputs from Review of Accounting Studies
#163
of 176 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#224,261
of 312,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Review of Accounting Studies
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,990,068 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 176 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,579 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.