↓ Skip to main content

Vascular anomalies: what a radiologist needs to know

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Radiology, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
227 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
110 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Vascular anomalies: what a radiologist needs to know
Published in
Pediatric Radiology, April 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00247-010-1621-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Josée Dubois, Marianne Alison

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 110 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 19 17%
Other 16 15%
Researcher 11 10%
Student > Master 9 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 6%
Other 27 25%
Unknown 21 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 66 60%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Psychology 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 <1%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 30 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2021.
All research outputs
#7,534,941
of 22,990,068 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Radiology
#651
of 2,093 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,510
of 95,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Radiology
#5
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,990,068 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,093 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,425 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.