↓ Skip to main content

Nutrition outcomes following implementation of validated swallowing and nutrition guidelines for patients with head and neck cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Supportive Care in Cancer, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nutrition outcomes following implementation of validated swallowing and nutrition guidelines for patients with head and neck cancer
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer, April 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00520-014-2180-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Teresa Brown, Lynda Ross, Lee Jones, Brett Hughes, Merrilyn Banks

Abstract

Head and neck cancer patients have a high risk of malnutrition and swallowing dysfunction. This study reports on adherence and nutrition outcomes with the use of local evidence-based guidelines for the nutrition management of patients with head and neck cancer, including placement of proactive gastrostomy tubes for high risk patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 107 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 10%
Student > Bachelor 10 9%
Other 9 8%
Researcher 6 6%
Other 18 17%
Unknown 35 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Engineering 2 2%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 44 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2016.
All research outputs
#7,198,746
of 22,751,628 outputs
Outputs from Supportive Care in Cancer
#1,774
of 4,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,716
of 225,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Supportive Care in Cancer
#26
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,751,628 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,561 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,531 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.