↓ Skip to main content

Ultrashort peptide nanofibrous hydrogels for the acceleration of healing of burn wounds

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Materials, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent
reddit
2 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
159 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
217 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ultrashort peptide nanofibrous hydrogels for the acceleration of healing of burn wounds
Published in
Clinical Materials, March 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.02.047
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yihua Loo, Yong-Chiat Wong, Elijah Z. Cai, Chuan-Han Ang, Ashvin Raju, Anupama Lakshmanan, Alvin G. Koh, Hui J. Zhou, Thiam-Chye Lim, Shabbir M. Moochhala, Charlotte A.E. Hauser

Abstract

There is an unmet clinical need for wound dressings to treat partial thickness burns that damage the epidermis and dermis. An ideal dressing needs to prevent infection, maintain skin hydration to facilitate debridement of the necrotic tissue, and provide cues to enhance tissue regeneration. We developed a class of 'smart' peptide hydrogels, which fulfill these criteria. Our ultrashort aliphatic peptides have an innate tendency to self-assemble into helical fibers, forming biomimetic hydrogel scaffolds which are non-immunogenic and non-cytotoxic. These nanofibrous hydrogels accelerated wound closure in a rat model for partial thickness burns. Two peptide hydrogel candidates demonstrate earlier onset and completion of autolytic debridement, compared to Mepitel(®), a silicone-coated polyamide net used as standard-of-care. They also promote epithelial and dermal regeneration in the absence of exogenous growth factors, achieving 86.2% and 92.9% wound closure respectively, after 14 days. In comparison, only 62.8% of the burnt area is healed for wounds dressed with Mepitel(®). Since the rate of wound closure is inversely correlated with hypertrophic scar formation and infection risks, our peptide hydrogel technology fills a niche neglected by current treatment options. The regenerative properties can be further enhanced by incorporation of bioactive moieties such as growth factors and cytokines.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 217 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 213 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 22%
Student > Master 31 14%
Researcher 29 13%
Student > Bachelor 21 10%
Student > Postgraduate 12 6%
Other 27 12%
Unknown 50 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 31 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 12%
Materials Science 24 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 10%
Engineering 16 7%
Other 38 18%
Unknown 61 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2019.
All research outputs
#1,034,745
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Materials
#184
of 10,758 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,998
of 235,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Materials
#4
of 127 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,758 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,434 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 127 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.