↓ Skip to main content

Image windowing mitigates edge effects in Differential Dynamic Microscopy

Overview of attention for article published in The European Physical Journal E, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Image windowing mitigates edge effects in Differential Dynamic Microscopy
Published in
The European Physical Journal E, November 2017
DOI 10.1140/epje/i2017-11587-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fabio Giavazzi, Paolo Edera, Peter J. Lu, Roberto Cerbino

Abstract

Differential Dynamic Microscopy (DDM) analyzes traditional real-space microscope images to extract information on sample dynamics in a way akin to light scattering, by decomposing each image in a sequence into Fourier modes, and evaluating their time correlation properties. DDM has been applied in a number of soft-matter and colloidal systems. However, objects observed to move out of the microscope's captured field of view, intersecting the edges of the acquired images, can introduce spurious but significant errors in the subsequent analysis. Here we show that application of a spatial windowing filter to images in a sequence before they enter the standard DDM analysis can reduce these artifacts substantially. Moreover, windowing can increase significantly the accessible range of wave vectors probed by DDM, and may further yield unexpected information, such as the size polydispersity of a colloidal suspension.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 33%
Student > Master 3 13%
Researcher 2 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 8%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 6 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 7 29%
Engineering 4 17%
Chemistry 3 13%
Chemical Engineering 2 8%
Energy 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2017.
All research outputs
#13,626,177
of 23,498,099 outputs
Outputs from The European Physical Journal E
#304
of 650 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,036
of 332,417 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The European Physical Journal E
#7
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,498,099 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 650 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,417 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.