↓ Skip to main content

Impact of clinical pharmacy services in a short stay unit of a hospital emergency department in Qatar

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
Title
Impact of clinical pharmacy services in a short stay unit of a hospital emergency department in Qatar
Published in
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, March 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11096-016-0290-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hani Abdelaziz, Rasha Al Anany, Ashraf Elmalik, Mohammad Saad, Kirti Prabhu, Haleema Al-Tamimi, Salem Abu Salah, Peter Cameron

Abstract

Background The presence of a clinical pharmacist in a hospital's Emergency Department (ED) is important to decrease the potential for medication errors. To our knowledge, no previous studies have been conducted to evaluate the impact of implementing clinical pharmacy services in the ED in Qatar. Objective To characterize the contributions of clinical pharmacists in a short stay unit of ED in order to implement and scale-up the service to all ED areas in the future. Methods A retrospective study conducted for 7 months in the ED of Hamad General Hospital, Qatar. The intervention recommendations were made by clinical pharmacists to the physician in charge during medical rounds. Results A total of 824 documented pharmacist recommendations were analyzed. The interventions included the following: Providing information to the physician (24.4 %) and recommending medication discontinuation (22.0 %), dose adjustment (19.3 %), medication addition (16.0 %), changes in frequency of medications (7.6 %), medication resumption (5.7 %), and patient education (5.0 %). Conclusion Clinical pharmacists in the ED studied play an important role in patient care.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Researcher 3 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 16 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 15 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2017.
All research outputs
#5,800,548
of 22,990,068 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
#280
of 1,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,411
of 301,431 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
#5
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,990,068 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,100 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 301,431 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.