↓ Skip to main content

Living high–training low altitude training: effects on mucosal immunity

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Applied Physiology, March 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
Title
Living high–training low altitude training: effects on mucosal immunity
Published in
European Journal of Applied Physiology, March 2005
DOI 10.1007/s00421-005-1317-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

E. Tiollier, L. Schmitt, P. Burnat, J-P. Fouillot, P. Robach, E. Filaire, CY. Guezennec, J-P. Richalet

Abstract

Secretory immunoglobulin A (sIgA) is the major immunoglobulin of the mucosal immune system. Whereas the suppressive effect of heavy training on mucosal immunity is well documented, little is known regarding the influence of hypoxia exposure on sIgA during altitude training. This investigation examined the impact of an 18-day Living high-training low (LHTL) training camp on sIgA levels in 11 (six females and five males) elite cross-country skiers. Subjects from the control group (n=5) trained and lived at 1,200 m of altitude, whereas, subjects from the LHTL group (n=6) trained at 1,200 m, but lived at a simulated altitude of 2,500, 3,000 and 3,500 m (3x6-day, 11 h day(-1)) in hypoxic rooms. Saliva samples were collected before, after each 6-day phases and 2 weeks thereafter (POST). Salivary sIgA, protein and cortisol were measured. There was a downward trend in sIgA concentrations over the study, which reached significance in LHTL (P<0.01), but not in control (P=0.08). Salivary IgA concentrations were still lower baseline at POST (P<0.05). Protein concentration increased in LHTL (P<0.05) and was negatively correlated with sIgA concentration after the 3,000 and 3,500 m-phase and at POST (P<0.05 all). Cortisol concentrations were unchanged over the study and no relationship was found between cortisol and sIgA. In summary, data were strongly suggestive of a cumulative negative effect of physical exercise and hypoxia on sIgA levels during LHTL training. Two weeks of active recovery did not allow for proper sIgA recovery. The mechanism underlying this depression of sIgA could be mediated by neural factors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 80 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 18%
Student > Master 12 14%
Researcher 11 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Professor 5 6%
Other 16 19%
Unknown 16 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 27 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 20 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2014.
All research outputs
#20,656,161
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#3,712
of 4,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,222
of 76,963 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#17
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,963 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.