↓ Skip to main content

Effectiveness of low-frequency vibration recovery method on blood lactate removal, muscle contractile properties and on time to exhaustion during cycling at VO2max power output

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Applied Physiology, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
126 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Effectiveness of low-frequency vibration recovery method on blood lactate removal, muscle contractile properties and on time to exhaustion during cycling at VO2max power output
Published in
European Journal of Applied Physiology, February 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00421-011-1848-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luis Carrasco, Borja Sañudo, Moisés de Hoyo, Francisco Pradas, Marzo E. Da Silva

Abstract

The aim of the study was to determine the effectiveness of low-frequency vibration recovery (LFV-rec) on blood lactate removal, muscle contractile properties, and on time to exhaustion during cycling at maximal oxygen uptake power output (pVO(2max)). Twelve active males carried out three experimental sessions. In session 1, participant's maximal oxygen uptake (VO(2max)) and pVO(2max) were determined, and in sessions 2 and 3, the participants performed a fatiguing exercise (2 min of cycling at pVO(2max)) and then a 15 min recovery period using one of two different methods: LFV-rec which consisted on sitting with feet on the vibratory platform (20 Hz; 4 mm) and passive recovery (P-rec), sitting without vibration stimulus. After that, participants performed an all-out exercise test on cycle ergometer at pVO(2max). In the recovery period, variables such as heart rate (HR), blood lactate concentration [Lac], and tensiomyographic parameters (D (m): maximal radial displacement; T (s): time of contraction maintenance, and T (r): relaxation time) were measured. In an all-out exercise test, mean time to exhaustion (TTE), total distance covered (TD), mean cycling velocity (V (m)), and maximal HR (HR(max)) were also assessed. The results showed no effect of recovery strategy on any of the assessed variables; nevertheless, higher values, although not significant, were observed in TTE, TD, and V (m) after LFV-rec intervention. In conclusion, LFV-rec strategy applied during 15 min after short and intense exercise does not seem to be effective on blood lactate removal, muscle contractile properties, and on time to exhaustion during cycling at pVO(2max).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 124 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 17%
Researcher 14 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 11%
Student > Bachelor 13 10%
Professor 9 7%
Other 29 23%
Unknown 25 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 53 42%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 10%
Engineering 4 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 28 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2014.
All research outputs
#17,286,645
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#3,318
of 4,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,568
of 118,457 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#39
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 118,457 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.