| Title |
Improvement of mouse embryo quality by myo-inositol supplementation of IVF media
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10815-014-0188-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sandra Colazingari, Maria Teresa Fiorenza, Gianfranco Carlomagno, Robert Najjar, Arturo Bevilacqua |
| Abstract |
Myo-inositol (myoIns) has a positive role in mammalian development and human reproduction. Since experiments on farming species suggest a similar role in preimplantation development, we evaluated the hypothesis that the inclusion of myoIns in human embryo culture media would produce an increase in embryo quality in IVF cycles, using the mouse embryo assay. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 21% |
| Researcher | 6 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 6 | 18% |
| Unknown | 4 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 30% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 24% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 15% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 5 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2014.
All research outputs
#16,371,088
of 24,119,703 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
#963
of 1,697 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#201,913
of 323,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
#12
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,119,703 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,697 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,160 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.