You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Rituximab-CHOP Versus CHOP Alone or With Maintenance Rituximab in Older Patients With Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Clinical Oncology, June 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1200/jco.2005.05.1003 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thomas M. Habermann, Edie A. Weller, Vicki A. Morrison, Randy D. Gascoyne, Peter A. Cassileth, Jeffrey B. Cohn, Shaker R. Dakhil, Bruce Woda, Richard I. Fisher, Bruce A. Peterson, Sandra J. Horning |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 373 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ecuador | 2 | <1% |
| Denmark | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Taiwan | 1 | <1% |
| Sri Lanka | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 359 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 56 | 15% |
| Other | 49 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 42 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 27 | 7% |
| Other | 89 | 24% |
| Unknown | 70 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 187 | 50% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 32 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 28 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 11 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 27 | 7% |
| Unknown | 82 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,242,689
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#3,035
of 22,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,964
of 91,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#10
of 156 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,229 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 91,678 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 156 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.