↓ Skip to main content

An Example of the Difference Between Quantum and Classical Random Walks

Overview of attention for article published in Quantum Information Processing, April 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
370 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
186 Mendeley
citeulike
7 CiteULike
Title
An Example of the Difference Between Quantum and Classical Random Walks
Published in
Quantum Information Processing, April 2002
DOI 10.1023/a:1019609420309
Authors

Andrew M. Childs, Edward Farhi, Sam Gutmann

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 3%
Canada 3 2%
Australia 2 1%
Spain 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 172 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 23%
Researcher 39 21%
Student > Master 24 13%
Student > Bachelor 15 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 13 7%
Other 34 18%
Unknown 19 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 121 65%
Computer Science 21 11%
Chemistry 7 4%
Mathematics 6 3%
Engineering 6 3%
Other 6 3%
Unknown 19 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2017.
All research outputs
#8,384,214
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Quantum Information Processing
#160
of 1,250 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,220
of 129,582 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Quantum Information Processing
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,250 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 129,582 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them