↓ Skip to main content

There is no “point” in decision-making: a model of transactive rationality for public policy and administration

Overview of attention for article published in Policy Sciences, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
There is no “point” in decision-making: a model of transactive rationality for public policy and administration
Published in
Policy Sciences, July 2009
DOI 10.1007/s11077-009-9098-y
Authors

Shyama Kuruvilla, Philipp Dorstewitz

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Unknown 117 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 28%
Researcher 20 16%
Student > Master 15 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Professor 7 6%
Other 22 18%
Unknown 18 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 61 49%
Business, Management and Accounting 11 9%
Environmental Science 8 6%
Psychology 5 4%
Computer Science 3 2%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 21 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2014.
All research outputs
#7,534,941
of 22,990,068 outputs
Outputs from Policy Sciences
#249
of 433 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,398
of 110,544 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Policy Sciences
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,990,068 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 433 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,544 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.