↓ Skip to main content

High-density single-particle tracking: quantifying molecule organization and dynamics at the nanoscale

Overview of attention for article published in Histochemistry and Cell Biology, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
Title
High-density single-particle tracking: quantifying molecule organization and dynamics at the nanoscale
Published in
Histochemistry and Cell Biology, March 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00418-014-1214-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jean-Baptiste Sibarita

Abstract

The organization and dynamics of proteins are fundamental parameters for cellular function. Their study, at the single-molecule level, provides precise information on molecular interactions. Over the last 30 years, the single-particle tracking imaging technique has proven its capability to efficiently quantify such parameters in many biological systems, with nanometric accuracy and millisecond temporal resolutions. Nevertheless, the low concentration of labeling required for single-molecule imaging usually prevents the extraction of large statistics. The advent of high-density single-molecule-based super-resolution techniques has revolutionized the field, allowing monitoring of thousands of biomolecules in the minute timescale and providing unprecedented insight into the molecular organization and dynamics of cellular compounds. In this issue, I will review the main principles of single-particle tracking, a highly interdisciplinary technique at the interface between microscopy, image analysis and labeling strategies. I will point out the advantages brought by high-density single-particle tracking which will be illustrated with a few recent biological results.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 2%
France 2 2%
Netherlands 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 92 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 28%
Researcher 20 20%
Student > Master 14 14%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 10 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 15%
Physics and Astronomy 15 15%
Neuroscience 7 7%
Chemistry 7 7%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 11 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2014.
All research outputs
#19,015,393
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from Histochemistry and Cell Biology
#660
of 926 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,436
of 228,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Histochemistry and Cell Biology
#10
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 926 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,946 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.