↓ Skip to main content

Slack length of gastrocnemius medialis and Achilles tendon occurs at different ankle angles

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Biomechanics, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
122 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
180 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Slack length of gastrocnemius medialis and Achilles tendon occurs at different ankle angles
Published in
Journal of Biomechanics, July 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.07.015
Pubmed ID
Authors

François Hug, Lilian Lacourpaille, Olivier Maïsetti, Antoine Nordez

Abstract

Although muscle-tendon slack length is a crucial parameter used in muscle models, this is one of the most difficult measures to estimate in vivo. The aim of this study was to determine the onset of the rise in tension (i.e., slack length) during passive stretching in both Achilles tendon and gastrocnemius medialis. Muscle and tendon shear elastic modulus was measured by elastography (supersonic shear imaging) during passive plantarflexion (0° and 90° of knee angle, 0° representing knee fully extended, in a random order) in 9 participants. The within-session repeatability of the determined slack length was good at 90° of knee flexion (SEM=3.3° and 2.2° for Achilles tendon and gastrocnemius medialis, respectively) and very good at 0° of knee flexion (SEM=1.9° and 1.9° for Achilles tendon and gastrocnemius medialis, respectively). The slack length of gastrocnemius medialis was obtained at a significantly lower plantarflexed angle than for Achilles tendon at both 0° (P<0.0001; mean difference=19.4±3.8°) and 90° of knee flexion (P<0.0001; mean difference=25.5±7.6°). In conclusion, this study showed that the joint angle at which the tendon falls slack can be experimentally determined using supersonic shear imaging. The slack length of gastrocnemius medialis and Achilles tendon occurred at different joint angles. Although reporting this result is crucial to a better understanding of muscle-tendon interactions, further experimental investigations are required to explain this result.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 180 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Ukraine 1 <1%
Unknown 174 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 22%
Student > Master 26 14%
Researcher 25 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 8%
Student > Bachelor 15 8%
Other 35 19%
Unknown 25 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 37 21%
Engineering 34 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 34 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 6%
Other 13 7%
Unknown 38 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2014.
All research outputs
#20,656,820
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biomechanics
#4,655
of 5,357 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,599
of 209,861 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biomechanics
#29
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,357 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,861 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.