↓ Skip to main content

Provocative motion causes fall in brain temperature and affects sleep in rats

Overview of attention for article published in Experimental Brain Research, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
Provocative motion causes fall in brain temperature and affects sleep in rats
Published in
Experimental Brain Research, March 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00221-014-3899-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Flavia Del Vecchio, Eugene Nalivaiko, Matteo Cerri, Marco Luppi, Roberto Amici

Abstract

Neural substrate of nausea is poorly understood, contrasting the wealth of knowledge about the emetic reflex. One of the reasons for this knowledge deficit is limited number and face validity of animal models of nausea. Our aim was to search for new physiological correlates of nausea in rats. Specifically, we addressed the question whether provocative motion (40-min rotation at 0.5 Hz) affects sleep architecture, brain temperature, heart rate (HR) and arterial pressure. Six adult male Sprague-Dawley rats were instrumented for recordings of EEG, nuchal electromyographic, hypothalamic temperature and arterial pressure. Provocative motion had the following effects: (1) total abolition of REM sleep during rotation and its substantial reduction during the first hour post-rotation (from 20 ± 3 to 5 ± 1.5 %); (2) reduction in NREM sleep, both during rotation (from 57 ± 6 to 19 ± 5 %) and during the first hour post-rotation (from 56 ± 3 to 41 ± 9 %); (3) fall in the brain temperature (from 37.1 ± 0.1 to 36.0 ± 0.1 °C); and (4) reduction in HR (from 375 ± 6 to 327 ± 7 bpm); arterial pressure was not affected. Ondansetron, a 5-HT3 antagonist, had no major effect on all observed parameters during both baseline and provocative motion. We conclude that in rats, provocative motion causes prolonged arousing effects, however without evidence of sympathetic activation that usually accompanies heightened arousal. Motion-induced fall in the brain temperature complements and extends our previous observations in rats and suggests that similar to humans, provocative motion triggers coordinated thermoregulatory response, leading to hypothermia in this species.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 10%
Korea, Republic of 1 5%
Unknown 18 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 14%
Student > Master 3 14%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 8 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 10%
Neuroscience 2 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Energy 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 7 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2014.
All research outputs
#20,226,756
of 22,751,628 outputs
Outputs from Experimental Brain Research
#2,905
of 3,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,491
of 223,667 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental Brain Research
#57
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,751,628 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,220 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,667 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.