| Title |
A novel downscaling approach to predict plant invasions and improve local conservation actions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Invasions, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10530-014-0688-z |
| Authors |
Rui F. Fernandes, Joana R. Vicente, Damien Georges, Paulo Alves, Wilfried Thuiller, João P. Honrado |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 2 | 50% |
| Spain | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 3 | 3% |
| Portugal | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| South Africa | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 80 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 26 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 14% |
| Unknown | 14 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 34 | 35% |
| Environmental Science | 33 | 34% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 5% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 15 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2015.
All research outputs
#13,406,705
of 22,751,628 outputs
Outputs from Biological Invasions
#1,615
of 2,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,527
of 225,522 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Invasions
#15
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,751,628 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,332 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,522 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.