↓ Skip to main content

Update on best available options in obstetrics anaesthesia: perinatal outcomes, side effects and maternal satisfaction. Fifteen years systematic literature review

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
Title
Update on best available options in obstetrics anaesthesia: perinatal outcomes, side effects and maternal satisfaction. Fifteen years systematic literature review
Published in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, March 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00404-014-3212-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Salvatore Gizzo, Marco Noventa, Simone Fagherazzi, Laura Lamparelli, Emanuele Ancona, Stefania Di Gangi, Carlo Saccardi, Donato D’Antona, Giovanni Battista Nardelli

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 120 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 13%
Student > Postgraduate 16 13%
Student > Master 14 11%
Other 13 10%
Student > Bachelor 13 10%
Other 29 23%
Unknown 23 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 70 56%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 10%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Arts and Humanities 2 2%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 25 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2017.
All research outputs
#8,880,246
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
#632
of 2,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,456
of 241,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
#12
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,385 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,550 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.