| Title |
Pattern scaling: Its strengths and limitations, and an update on the latest model simulations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Climatic Change, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10584-013-1032-9 |
| Authors |
Claudia Tebaldi, Julie M. Arblaster |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 247 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 3 | 1% |
| Sweden | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 237 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 83 | 34% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 47 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 7% |
| Professor | 17 | 7% |
| Other | 11 | 4% |
| Other | 34 | 14% |
| Unknown | 38 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 95 | 38% |
| Environmental Science | 47 | 19% |
| Engineering | 12 | 5% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 7 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 28 | 11% |
| Unknown | 51 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2021.
All research outputs
#1,697,797
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Climatic Change
#975
of 6,078 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,480
of 322,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climatic Change
#13
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,078 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,105 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.