↓ Skip to main content

Can a mind have two time lines? Exploring space–time mapping in Mandarin and English speakers

Overview of attention for article published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
Title
Can a mind have two time lines? Exploring space–time mapping in Mandarin and English speakers
Published in
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, February 2011
DOI 10.3758/s13423-011-0068-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lynden K. Miles, Lucy Tan, Grant D. Noble, Joanne Lumsden, C. Neil Macrae

Abstract

Spatial representations of time are a ubiquitous feature of human cognition. Nevertheless, interesting sociolinguistic variations exist with respect to where in space people locate temporal constructs. For instance, while in English time metaphorically flows horizontally, in Mandarin an additional vertical dimension is employed. Noting that the bilingual mind can flexibly accommodate multiple representations, the present work explored whether Mandarin-English bilinguals possess two mental time lines. Across two experiments, we demonstrated that Mandarin-English bilinguals do indeed employ both horizontal and vertical representations of time. Importantly, subtle variations to cultural context were seen to shape how these time lines were deployed.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Germany 1 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 109 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 24%
Student > Master 15 13%
Student > Bachelor 14 12%
Researcher 11 9%
Professor 8 7%
Other 25 21%
Unknown 16 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 42 36%
Linguistics 33 28%
Social Sciences 6 5%
Computer Science 4 3%
Neuroscience 3 3%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 22 19%