↓ Skip to main content

Rwanda 20 years on: investing in life

Overview of attention for article published in The Lancet, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
15 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
239 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
159 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
479 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rwanda 20 years on: investing in life
Published in
The Lancet, April 2014
DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(14)60574-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Agnes Binagwaho, Paul E Farmer, Sabin Nsanzimana, Corine Karema, Michel Gasana, Jean de Dieu Ngirabega, Fidele Ngabo, Claire M Wagner, Cameron T Nutt, Thierry Nyatanyi, Maurice Gatera, Yvonne Kayiteshonga, Cathy Mugeni, Placidie Mugwaneza, Joseph Shema, Parfait Uwaliraye, Erick Gaju, Marie Aimee Muhimpundu, Theophile Dushime, Florent Senyana, Jean Baptiste Mazarati, Celsa Muzayire Gaju, Lisine Tuyisenge, Vincent Mutabazi, Patrick Kyamanywa, Vincent Rusanganwa, Jean Pierre Nyemazi, Agathe Umutoni, Ida Kankindi, Christian Ntizimira, Hinda Ruton, Nathan Mugume, Denis Nkunda, Espérance Ndenga, Joel M Mubiligi, Jean Baptiste Kakoma, Etienne Karita, Claude Sekabaraga, Emmanuel Rusingiza, Michael L Rich, Joia S Mukherjee, Joseph Rhatigan, Corrado Cancedda, Didi Bertrand-Farmer, Gene Bukhman, Sara N Stulac, Neo M Tapela, Cassia van der Hoof Holstein, Lawrence N Shulman, Antoinette Habinshuti, Matthew H Bonds, Michael S Wilkes, Chunling Lu, Mary C Smith-Fawzi, JaBaris D Swain, Michael P Murphy, Alan Ricks, Vanessa B Kerry, Barbara P Bush, Richard W Siegler, Cori S Stern, Anne Sliney, Tej Nuthulaganti, Injonge Karangwa, Elisabetta Pegurri, Ophelia Dahl, Peter C Drobac

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 239 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 479 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 1%
Rwanda 3 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Bolivia, Plurinational State of 1 <1%
Qatar 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 460 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 127 27%
Researcher 66 14%
Student > Bachelor 49 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 9%
Other 31 6%
Other 83 17%
Unknown 78 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 142 30%
Social Sciences 72 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 55 11%
Psychology 19 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 4%
Other 78 16%
Unknown 94 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 328. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2022.
All research outputs
#103,861
of 25,789,020 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#1,465
of 42,994 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#802
of 240,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#10
of 485 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,789,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,994 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 68.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,207 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 485 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.