↓ Skip to main content

Cumulated Time With Low Bispectral Index Values Is Not Related to the Risk of New Cancer or Death Within 5 Years After Surgery in Patients With Previous or Prevailing Malignancy

Overview of attention for article published in Anesthesia and analgesia, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cumulated Time With Low Bispectral Index Values Is Not Related to the Risk of New Cancer or Death Within 5 Years After Surgery in Patients With Previous or Prevailing Malignancy
Published in
Anesthesia and analgesia, April 2014
DOI 10.1213/ane.0000000000000097
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maj-Lis Lindholm, Lars Brudin, Rolf H. Sandin

Abstract

Preclinical data indicate that anesthesia and surgery may promote cancer growth. We previously found no increased risk of malignant disease within 5 years regarding duration of general anesthesia (TANESTH) and time with Bispectral Index (BIS) under 45 (TBIS < 45) in patients without any diagnosis or history of malignancy before or within 1 month after surgery. Because immunocompetence may be different in patients with previous malignant disease, we investigated the corresponding risk in patients with earlier or existing malignant disease at the time of surgery.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 2 11%
Other 2 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Lecturer 1 5%
Other 4 21%
Unknown 6 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Unspecified 1 5%
Psychology 1 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2014.
All research outputs
#17,286,379
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Anesthesia and analgesia
#6,050
of 8,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,646
of 239,200 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Anesthesia and analgesia
#34
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,087 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,200 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.