↓ Skip to main content

Stressläsionen im oberen Gastrointestinaltrakt

Overview of attention for article published in Die Anaesthesiologie, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Stressläsionen im oberen Gastrointestinaltrakt
Published in
Die Anaesthesiologie, July 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00101-012-2048-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

U. Jaschinski

Abstract

Clinically relevant bleeding in the upper gastrointestinal tract due to stress lesions is a rare event; however, the related mortality may be as high as 13% (van Leerdam, Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2008; 22:209-224). Most often affected are patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) with impaired perfusion as the protective pathways are critically dependent on a near normal blood flow. Minimal mucosal lesions with a tiny hemorrhage can escalate to severe bleeding as the coagulation potential in the presence of an acidic pH is clearly decreased. Mechanical ventilation and coagulopathy are recognized risk factors and these patients should receive an acid suppressing therapy. Proton pump inhibitors (PPI) and histamine type 2 receptor antagonists (H(2)RA) are equal in their ability to prevent stress-related bleeding. However, the side effects of PPI can cause severe morbidity and therefore H(2)RAs may be the drug of choice for prophylaxis. Endoscopy is recommended as a diagnostic and therapeutic tool for patients with active bleeding. Treatment with PPI in this scenario (before and after endoscopy) may reduce complications by leading to premature hemostasis and reduced recurrence of bleeding.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 11%
Unknown 25 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 39%
Other 5 18%
Student > Master 2 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Lecturer 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 5 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 64%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Neuroscience 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2014.
All research outputs
#22,759,452
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Die Anaesthesiologie
#524
of 622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,926
of 177,929 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Die Anaesthesiologie
#5
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 622 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,929 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.