↓ Skip to main content

Developing Visually Based, Low-Literacy Health Education Tools for African Americans with Psychotic Disorders and Their Families

Overview of attention for article published in Community Mental Health Journal, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
118 Mendeley
Title
Developing Visually Based, Low-Literacy Health Education Tools for African Americans with Psychotic Disorders and Their Families
Published in
Community Mental Health Journal, March 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10597-013-9666-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Beth Broussard, Jeremy B. Radkins, Michael T. Compton

Abstract

Schizophrenia presents particular challenges to health literacy, partly due to associated neurocognitive deficits. In order to develop engaging, recovery-oriented, visually based psychoeducational tools pertaining to psychotic disorders, thirty-nine individuals, consisting of mental health service users with serious mental illnesses, family members, and mental health professionals, participated in informal discussions. Using suggestions from these groups, the first two psychoeducational booklets of a planned series were developed in collaboration with a graphic designer and visual artist. Content of the booklets was developed addressing four components: knowledge, self-efficacy/self-management, incorporating a workbook format, and planning/contracting. In a follow-up discussion group, mental health service users provided positive feedback on the completed booklets. The finished booklets are practical, accessible, engaging, and low-literacy. These and other innovative approaches are needed to enhance mental health care, promote self-efficacy/empowerment, and encourage communication between service users, family members, and providers, especially in light of limited health literacy, illness-related neurocognitive impairments, and stigma.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 117 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 12%
Researcher 13 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 9%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Other 27 23%
Unknown 26 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 22%
Psychology 23 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 14%
Social Sciences 10 8%
Unspecified 2 2%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 33 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2015.
All research outputs
#13,913,047
of 22,751,628 outputs
Outputs from Community Mental Health Journal
#675
of 1,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,114
of 221,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Community Mental Health Journal
#8
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,751,628 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,280 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,673 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.