↓ Skip to main content

MRI signal phase oscillates with neuronal activity in cerebral cortex: Implications for neuronal current imaging

Overview of attention for article published in NeuroImage, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
MRI signal phase oscillates with neuronal activity in cerebral cortex: Implications for neuronal current imaging
Published in
NeuroImage, March 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.03.015
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jiaxin Du, Viktor Vegh, David C. Reutens

Abstract

Neuronal activity produces transient ionic currents that may be detectable using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We examined the feasibility of MRI-based detection of neuronal currents using computer simulations based on the laminar cortex model (LCM). Instead of simulating the activity of single neurons, we decomposed neuronal activity to action potentials (AP) and postsynaptic potentials (PSP). The geometries of dendrites and axons were generated dynamically to account for diverse neuronal morphologies. Magnetic fields associated with APs and PSPs were calculated during spontaneous and stimulated cortical activity, from which the neuronal current induced MRI signal was determined. We found that the MRI signal magnitude change (<0.1 ppm) is below currently detectable levels but that the signal phase change is likely to be detectable. Furthermore, neuronal MRI signals are sensitive to temporal and spatial variations in neuronal activity but independent of the intensity of neuronal activation. Synchronised neuronal activity produces large phase changes (in the order of 0.1 mrad). However, signal phase oscillates with neuronal activity. Consequently, MRI scans need to be synchronised with neuronal oscillations to maximise the likelihood of detecting signal phase changes due to neuronal currents. These findings inform the design of MRI experiments to detect neuronal currents.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Cuba 2 4%
United Kingdom 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Switzerland 1 2%
Unknown 40 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 24%
Researcher 9 20%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 13%
Student > Master 5 11%
Professor 4 9%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 3 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 11 24%
Neuroscience 9 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 13%
Psychology 5 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 7%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 5 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2014.
All research outputs
#20,656,820
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from NeuroImage
#10,824
of 12,205 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,222
of 235,983 outputs
Outputs of similar age from NeuroImage
#116
of 140 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,205 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,983 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 140 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.