↓ Skip to main content

Alt a 1 from Alternaria interacts with PR5 thaumatin‐like proteins

Overview of attention for article published in Febs Letters, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Alt a 1 from Alternaria interacts with PR5 thaumatin‐like proteins
Published in
Febs Letters, March 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.febslet.2014.02.044
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cristina Gómez-Casado, Amaya Murua-García, María Garrido-Arandia, Pablo González-Melendi, Rosa Sánchez-Monge, Domingo Barber, Luis F. Pacios, Araceli Díaz-Perales

Abstract

Alt a 1 is a protein found in Alternaria alternata spores related to virulence and pathogenicity and considered to be responsible for chronic asthma in children. We found that spores of Alternaria inoculated on the outer surface of kiwifruits did not develop hyphae. Nevertheless, the expression of Alt a 1 gene was upregulated, and the protein was detected in the pulp where it co-localized with kiwi PR5. Pull-down assays demonstrated experimentally that the two proteins interact in such a way that Alt a 1 inhibits the enzymatic activity of PR5. These results are relevant not only for plant defense, but also for human health as patients with chronic asthma could suffer from an allergic reaction when they eat fruit contaminated with Alternaria.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Italy 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 50 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Researcher 4 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 8%
Student > Master 4 8%
Other 11 21%
Unknown 15 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 18 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2014.
All research outputs
#1,595,633
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Febs Letters
#119
of 14,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,749
of 235,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Febs Letters
#3
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,379 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,434 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.