| Title |
Using complex networks concepts to assess approaches for citations in scientific papers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientometrics, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11192-012-0630-z |
| Authors |
D. R. Amancio, M. G. V. Nunes, O. N. Oliveira, L. da F. Costa |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 55 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Librarian | 11 | 17% |
| Researcher | 9 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 32% |
| Unknown | 4 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 16 | 25% |
| Computer Science | 15 | 24% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 5 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 14% |
| Unknown | 9 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2022.
All research outputs
#16,160,066
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Scientometrics
#2,000
of 2,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,157
of 256,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientometrics
#20
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,975 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 256,415 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.