↓ Skip to main content

T-type calcium channels in chronic pain: mouse models and specific blockers

Overview of attention for article published in Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
Title
T-type calcium channels in chronic pain: mouse models and specific blockers
Published in
Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology, March 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00424-014-1484-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amaury François, Sophie Laffray, Anne Pizzoccaro, Alain Eschalier, Emmanuel Bourinet

Abstract

Pain is a quite frequent complaint accompanying numerous pathologies. Among these pathological cases, neuropathies are retrieved with identified etiologies (chemotherapies, diabetes, surgeries…) and also more diffuse syndromes such as fibromyalgia. More broadly, pain is one of the first consequences of the majority of inherited diseases. Despite its importance for the quality of life, current pain management is limited to drugs that are either old or with a limited efficacy or that possess a bad benefit/risk ratio. As no new pharmacological concept has led to new analgesics in the last decades, the discovery of medications is needed, and to this aim the identification of new druggable targets in pain transmission is a first step. Therefore, studies of ion channels in pain pathways are extremely active. This is particularly true with ion channels in peripheral sensory neurons in dorsal root ganglia (DRG) known now to express unique sets of these channels. Moreover, both spinal and supraspinal levels are clearly important in pain modulation. Among these ion channels, we and others revealed the important role of low voltage-gated calcium channels in cellular excitability in different steps of the pain pathways. These channels, by being activated nearby resting membrane potential have biophysical characteristics suited to facilitate action potential generation and rhythmicity. In this review, we will review the current knowledge on the role of these channels in the perception and modulation of pain.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Austria 1 2%
Unknown 56 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 16%
Student > Bachelor 7 12%
Student > Master 5 9%
Professor 3 5%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 15 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 9%
Neuroscience 4 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 5%
Other 12 21%
Unknown 15 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2014.
All research outputs
#19,221,261
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology
#1,557
of 1,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,986
of 222,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology
#25
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,973 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 222,720 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.