↓ Skip to main content

Natural products in therapy

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, August 1982
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Natural products in therapy
Published in
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, August 1982
DOI 10.1007/bf01962629
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. Baerheim Svendsen, J. J. C. Scheffer

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 38%
Professor 1 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 13%
Student > Master 1 13%
Student > Postgraduate 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 3 38%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 13%
Arts and Humanities 1 13%
Social Sciences 1 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2014.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
#632
of 1,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,959
of 7,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,578 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 7,236 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them