You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Aggressive interactions during free-play at preschool of children with and without developmental coordination disorder
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ridd.2013.05.033 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
A. Kennedy-Behr, S. Rodger, S. Mickan |
| Abstract |
This aim of this study was to investigate an unexpected finding from a larger study examining the play of preschool children with and without developmental coordination disorder (DCD). We found that children with DCD were more frequently involved in aggressive incidents during free-play than their peers. Children with (n=32) and without DCD (n=31) were videotaped during free-play at preschool and their play was assessed using the Play Observation Scale. A post hoc analysis was conducted using a specifically developed rating instrument to examine the aggressive incidents captured on video. Videos from 18 children with DCD and 8 typically developing children without DCD were found to contain aggressive incidents. Children with DCD were significantly more often involved as both aggressor (p=.016) and victim (p=.008) than children without DCD (p=.031). This is the first study to identify victimization and aggression as being problematic for children with DCD as young as 4 years of age and needs replication. Given the negative consequences of involvement in aggression and victimization, play-based early intervention focusing on prevention needs to be developed and implemented. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Latvia | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 120 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 25 | 20% |
| Researcher | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 10% |
| Other | 23 | 19% |
| Unknown | 22 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 25 | 20% |
| Social Sciences | 18 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 11% |
| Sports and Recreations | 11 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 16 | 13% |
| Unknown | 30 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2014.
All research outputs
#22,758,309
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities
#2,001
of 2,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,466
of 209,397 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities
#56
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,300 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,397 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.