↓ Skip to main content

Applying deep neural networks to unstructured text notes in electronic medical records for phenotyping youth depression

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Mental Health, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
10 X users
patent
2 patents
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
155 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Applying deep neural networks to unstructured text notes in electronic medical records for phenotyping youth depression
Published in
BMJ Mental Health, July 2017
DOI 10.1136/eb-2017-102688
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joseph Geraci, Pamela Wilansky, Vincenzo de Luca, Anvesh Roy, James L Kennedy, John Strauss

Abstract

We report a study of machine learning applied to the phenotyping of psychiatric diagnosis for research recruitment in youth depression, conducted with 861 labelled electronic medical records (EMRs) documents. A model was built that could accurately identify individuals who were suitable candidates for a study on youth depression. Our objective was a model to identify individuals who meet inclusion criteria as well as unsuitable patients who would require exclusion. Our methods included applying a system that coded the EMR documents by removing personally identifying information, using two psychiatrists who labelled a set of EMR documents (from which the 861 came), using a brute force search and training a deep neural network for this task. According to a cross-validation evaluation, we describe a model that had a specificity of 97% and a sensitivity of 45% and a second model with a specificity of 53% and a sensitivity of 89%. We combined these two models into a third one (sensitivity 93.5%; specificity 68%; positive predictive value (precision) 77%) to generate a list of most suitable candidates in support of research recruitment. Our efforts are meant to demonstrate the potential for this type of approach for patient recruitment purposes but it should be noted that a larger sample size is required to build a truly reliable recommendation system. Future efforts will employ alternate neural network algorithms available and other machine learning methods.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 155 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 15%
Student > Master 20 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Student > Bachelor 8 5%
Other 21 14%
Unknown 50 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 39 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 12%
Engineering 8 5%
Psychology 7 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Other 23 15%
Unknown 54 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2023.
All research outputs
#1,494,615
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Mental Health
#90
of 920 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,120
of 326,540 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Mental Health
#4
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 920 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,540 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.