| Title |
Mating compatibility and competitiveness of transgenic and wild type Aedes aegypti (L.) under contained semi-field conditions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Transgenic Research, June 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11248-012-9625-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
H. L. Lee, Seshadri Vasan, Nazni Wasi Ahmad, Iswarti Idris, Norhaida Hanum, S. Selvi, Luke Alphey, Shahnaz Murad |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 87 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 24 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 24% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 16% |
| Unknown | 10 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 41 | 46% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Unknown | 12 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2015.
All research outputs
#7,534,941
of 22,990,068 outputs
Outputs from Transgenic Research
#368
of 895 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,304
of 166,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Transgenic Research
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,990,068 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 895 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,749 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.