↓ Skip to main content

Nomograms to predict recurrence and survival in stage IIIB and IIIC melanoma after therapeutic lymphadenectomy

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Cancer (1965), March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nomograms to predict recurrence and survival in stage IIIB and IIIC melanoma after therapeutic lymphadenectomy
Published in
European Journal of Cancer (1965), March 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.ejca.2014.02.010
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kiarash Khosrotehrani, Augustinus P.T. van der Ploeg, Victor Siskind, Maria Celia Hughes, Annaliesa Wright, Janine Thomas, Andrew Barbour, Christopher Allan, Gerard Bayley, Alexander Eggermont, Cornelis Verhoef, B. Mark Smithers, Adele C. Green

Abstract

Current staging algorithms in melanoma patients undergoing therapeutic lymph node dissection (LND) fail to accurately distinguish long-term survivors from those at risk of rapid relapse. Our goal was to establish and validate nomograms for predicting both recurrence and survival after LND.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 19%
Other 5 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 12%
Professor 2 8%
Researcher 2 8%
Other 6 23%
Unknown 3 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 62%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 8%
Psychology 2 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Unknown 5 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2014.
All research outputs
#16,047,334
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Cancer (1965)
#5,277
of 6,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,050
of 235,898 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Cancer (1965)
#31
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,871 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,898 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.