You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Assessing bias in a prospective study of diabetes that implemented substitution sampling as a recruitment strategy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.12.004 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael C. David, Robert S. Ware, Rosa Alati, Jo Dower, Maria Donald |
| Abstract |
Strategies such as reminders are frequently used to maximize baseline recruitment and for this reason are collectively termed "usual practice." The objective of this study was to investigate substitution sampling as an alternative recruitment strategy. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 27% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 9% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 3 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mathematics | 1 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 9% |
| Psychology | 1 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 9% |
| Other | 2 | 18% |
| Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2014.
All research outputs
#20,655,488
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
#4,435
of 4,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,078
of 235,869 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
#27
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,782 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,869 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.