↓ Skip to main content

A policy of free access to asthma medicines in Brazil: an opportunity for pharmacists to optimize asthma treatment

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
Title
A policy of free access to asthma medicines in Brazil: an opportunity for pharmacists to optimize asthma treatment
Published in
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, June 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11096-013-9807-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pablo Moura Santos, Lúcia Noblat, Álvaro A. Cruz

Abstract

Asthma is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the airways that is characterized by recurrent symptoms associated with airflow limitation and by bronchial hyper-responsiveness. Free asthma treatment has been guaranteed in Brazil since 2003, notably after the Brazilian government decided to support drugs for the most serious forms of the disease. The asthma treatment access policy in Brazil offers a new opportunity for pharmacists to work closely with patients, and for caregivers and health care teams to promote educational activities and patient counselling about asthma. Pharmacists have an important role in the management of drug therapy within the health care team. Pharmacists should be prepared to engage with the latest concept of health care delivery proposed for Brazilian Unified Health System. These are centred on forming health care networks and strengthening multidisciplinary teams to integrate all professionals who are in charge of patient care.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 39 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 20%
Researcher 7 18%
Student > Bachelor 5 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 11 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 25%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 15%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 12 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2014.
All research outputs
#14,193,746
of 22,751,628 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
#687
of 1,078 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,056
of 196,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
#11
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,751,628 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,078 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,720 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.