↓ Skip to main content

Changes in hip fracture rates in southeastern Australia spanning the period 1994–2007

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Bone & Mineral Research, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Changes in hip fracture rates in southeastern Australia spanning the period 1994–2007
Published in
Journal of Bone & Mineral Research, March 2011
DOI 10.1002/jbmr.393
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julie A Pasco, Sharon L Brennan, Margaret J Henry, Geoffrey C Nicholson, Kerrie M Sanders, Yu Zhang, Mark A Kotowicz

Abstract

Hip fracture incidence rates appear to be declining in Western populations. Utilizing comprehensive incident hip fracture data from radiology reports, we determined changes in hip fracture rates in southeastern Australia between 1994-1996 and 2006-2007 for residents aged 55 years or older. During this period, the population at risk increased by 47% for men and 40% for women. Although the absolute number of hip fractures increased by 53% in men and 4.4% in women, standardized hip fracture ratios were 0.92 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.79-1.08] and 0.69 (95% CI 0.62-0.77), respectively. Marked reductions in hip fracture rates were observed for women: 32% for ages 75 to 84 years and 29% for ages 85 years or older. Data from the Geelong Osteoporosis Study were used to identify changes in body composition and lifestyle that might have influenced hip fracture risk in women during this period. Between 1993-1997 and 2004-2008, there was an increase in adiposity, bone mineral density (BMD), healthy lifestyles, and exposure to bone-active drugs; use of hormone therapy declined. Thus hip fracture incidence rates have decreased from the mid-1990 s to the mid-2000 s, the effect being greater among women. Our data also suggest that the recent increase in adiposity and consequent increase in BMD at the hip may have contributed to this decline. However, improved efficacy and increased uptake of antifracture drug treatments, other cohort effects, or other environmental influences cannot be excluded.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 17%
Student > Master 4 17%
Researcher 4 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 17%
Other 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 4 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 7 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2011.
All research outputs
#20,049,161
of 25,508,813 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Bone & Mineral Research
#4,269
of 4,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,291
of 120,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Bone & Mineral Research
#26
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,508,813 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,798 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,628 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.