| Title |
Comparative Effectiveness of Audit-Feedback Versus Additional Physician Communication Training to Improve Cancer Screening for Patients with Limited Health Literacy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11606-014-2782-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eboni G. Price-Haywood, Jewel Harden-Barrios, Lisa A. Cooper |
| Abstract |
We designed a continuing medical education (CME) program to teach primary care physicians (PCP) how to engage in cancer risk communication and shared decision making with patients who have limited health literacy (HL). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 60% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 182 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 180 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 35 | 19% |
| Researcher | 27 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 35 | 19% |
| Unknown | 44 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 63 | 35% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 12% |
| Psychology | 17 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 15 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 7% |
| Unknown | 50 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2015.
All research outputs
#13,978,562
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#5,149
of 7,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,530
of 314,524 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#44
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,524 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.