↓ Skip to main content

Patient Safety Knowledge and Its Determinants in Medical Trainees

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of General Internal Medicine, June 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
Title
Patient Safety Knowledge and Its Determinants in Medical Trainees
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine, June 2007
DOI 10.1007/s11606-007-0247-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

B. Price Kerfoot, Paul R. Conlin, Thomas Travison, Graham T. McMahon

Abstract

Patient safety is a core educational topic for medical trainees. To determine the current level and determinants of patient safety knowledge in medical trainees. Multi-institutional cross-sectional assessment of patient safety knowledge. Residents and medical students from seven Harvard-affiliated residencies and two Harvard Medical School courses. Participants were administered a 14-item validated test instrument developed based on the patient safety curriculum of the Risk Management Foundation (Cambridge, MA). The primary outcome measure was the amount of patient safety knowledge demonstrated by trainees on the validated test instrument. The secondary outcome measure was their subjective perceptions as to their baseline knowledge level in this domain. Ninety-two percent (640/693) of residents and medical students completed the patient safety test. Participants correctly answered a mean 58.4% of test items (SD 15.5%). Univariate analyses show that patient safety knowledge levels varied significantly by year of training (p = 0.001), degree program (p < 0.001), specialty (p < 0.001), country of medical school (p = 0.006), age (p < 0.001), and gender (p = 0.050); all but the latter two determinants remained statistically significant in multivariate models. In addition, trainees were unable to assess their own knowledge deficiencies in this domain. Patient safety knowledge is limited among medical trainees across a broad range of training levels, degrees, and specialties. Effective educational interventions that target deficiencies in patient safety knowledge are greatly needed.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Chile 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Uruguay 1 1%
Unknown 82 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 13%
Student > Master 11 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 12%
Researcher 8 9%
Student > Postgraduate 8 9%
Other 27 31%
Unknown 11 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 15%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 6%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 13 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2012.
All research outputs
#7,943,894
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#4,251
of 7,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,896
of 72,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#19
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 72,190 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.