↓ Skip to main content

Evidence for Shared Pain Mechanisms in Osteoarthritis, Low Back Pain, and Fibromyalgia

Overview of attention for article published in Current Rheumatology Reports, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
124 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
194 Mendeley
Title
Evidence for Shared Pain Mechanisms in Osteoarthritis, Low Back Pain, and Fibromyalgia
Published in
Current Rheumatology Reports, August 2011
DOI 10.1007/s11926-011-0206-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roland Staud

Abstract

Osteoarthritis (OA), low back pain (LBP), and fibromyalgia (FM) are common chronic pain disorders that occur frequently in the general population. They are a significant cause of dysfunction and disability. Why some of these chronic pain disorders remain localized to few body areas (OA and LBP), whereas others become widespread (FM) is unclear at this time. Genetic, environmental, and psychosocial factors likely play an important role. Although patients with OA, LBP, and FM frequently demonstrate abnormalities of muscles, ligaments, or joints, the severity of such changes is only poorly correlated with clinical pain. Importantly, many patients with these chronic pain disorders show signs of central sensitization and abnormal endogenous pain modulation. Nociceptive signaling is actively regulated by the central nervous system to allow adaptive responses after tissue injuries. Thus, abnormal processing of tonic peripheral tissue impulse input likely plays an important role in the pathogenesis of OA, LBP, or FM. Tonic and/or intense afferent nociceptive barrage can result in central sensitization that depends on facilitatory input from brainstem centers via descending pain pathways to the spinal cord. Abnormal endogenous control of these descending pathways can lead to excessive excitability of dorsal horn neurons of the spinal cord and pain. Ineffective endogenous pain control and central sensitization are important features of OA, LBP, and FM patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 194 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 2%
Portugal 2 1%
Spain 2 1%
Brazil 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Cuba 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 180 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 13%
Researcher 24 12%
Student > Bachelor 21 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 8%
Other 47 24%
Unknown 31 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 70 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 9%
Neuroscience 10 5%
Psychology 7 4%
Other 24 12%
Unknown 40 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2014.
All research outputs
#3,837,762
of 24,066,486 outputs
Outputs from Current Rheumatology Reports
#141
of 728 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,771
of 123,556 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Rheumatology Reports
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,066,486 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 728 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,556 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.