Title |
Biotransformation of HCFC-22, HCFC-142b, HCFC-123, and HFC-134a by methanotrophic mixed culture MM1
|
---|---|
Published in |
Biodegradation, January 1995
|
DOI | 10.1007/bf00702293 |
Authors |
Wang-kuan Chang, Craig S. Criddle |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 18 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 21% |
Researcher | 3 | 16% |
Student > Master | 3 | 16% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 11% |
Professor | 2 | 11% |
Other | 2 | 11% |
Unknown | 3 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 6 | 32% |
Environmental Science | 4 | 21% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 16% |
Chemistry | 1 | 5% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 5% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 4 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2012.
All research outputs
#4,748,235
of 22,992,311 outputs
Outputs from Biodegradation
#22
of 372 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,211
of 76,642 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodegradation
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,992,311 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 372 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,642 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.