↓ Skip to main content

Is science socially constructed—And can it still inform public policy?

Overview of attention for article published in Science and Engineering Ethics, September 1996
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
Title
Is science socially constructed—And can it still inform public policy?
Published in
Science and Engineering Ethics, September 1996
DOI 10.1007/bf02583913
Authors

Sheila Jasanoff

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 6%
United Kingdom 3 3%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 96 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 30%
Student > Master 23 22%
Researcher 14 13%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Professor 7 7%
Other 16 15%
Unknown 7 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 42 40%
Environmental Science 13 12%
Engineering 10 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 8%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 5%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 13 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2012.
All research outputs
#5,033,437
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Science and Engineering Ethics
#373
of 947 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,900
of 30,701 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science and Engineering Ethics
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 947 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 30,701 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them