↓ Skip to main content

Using Economic Evaluations to Make Formulary Coverage Decisions

Overview of attention for article published in PharmacoEconomics, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
Using Economic Evaluations to Make Formulary Coverage Decisions
Published in
PharmacoEconomics, October 2012
DOI 10.2165/00019053-200018010-00006
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aslam H. Anis, Yves Gagnon

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 3%
Canada 1 3%
Unknown 28 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 23%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Professor 2 7%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Other 7 23%
Unknown 2 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 33%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 20%
Social Sciences 2 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Other 5 17%
Unknown 4 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2015.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from PharmacoEconomics
#996
of 1,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,706
of 192,683 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PharmacoEconomics
#277
of 719 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,992 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,683 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 719 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.