| Title |
Comparison of the Automated Nonradiometric Bactec MGIT 960 System with Löwenstein-Jensen, Coletsos, and Middlebrook 7H11 Solid Media for Recovery of Mycobacteria
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, June 2000
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s100960050492 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
P. Idigoras, X. Beristain, A. Iturzaeta, D. Vicente, E. Pérez-Trallero |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 5 | 18% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 18% |
| Researcher | 5 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 14% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 6 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 29% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 14% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 11% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 6 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2012.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
#906
of 3,084 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,330
of 39,990 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,084 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 39,990 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.