↓ Skip to main content

Role for T-type Ca2+ channels in sleep waves

Overview of attention for article published in Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
Title
Role for T-type Ca2+ channels in sleep waves
Published in
Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology, March 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00424-014-1477-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vincenzo Crunelli, Francois David, Nathalie Leresche, Régis C. Lambert

Abstract

Since their discovery more than 30 years ago, low-threshold T-type Ca(2+) channels (T channels) have been suggested to play a key role in many EEG waves of non-REM sleep, which has remained exclusively linked to the ability of these channels to generate low-threshold Ca(2+) potentials and associated high-frequency bursts of action potentials. Our present understanding of the biophysics and physiology of T channels, however, highlights a much more diverse and complex picture of the pivotal contributions that they make to different sleep rhythms. In particular, recent experimental evidence has conclusively demonstrated the essential contribution of thalamic T channels to the expression of slow waves of natural sleep and the key role played by Ca(2+) entry through these channels in the activation or modulation of other voltage-dependent channels that are important for the generation of both slow waves and sleep spindles. However, the precise contribution to sleep rhythms of T channels in cortical neurons and other sleep-controlling neuronal networks remains unknown, and a full understanding of the cellular and network mechanisms of sleep delta waves is still lacking.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
France 2 3%
Unknown 54 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 41%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 22%
Student > Master 5 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 5%
Professor 2 3%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 6 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 19 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 5%
Psychology 2 3%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 9 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2014.
All research outputs
#18,550,468
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology
#1,512
of 1,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,652
of 223,623 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology
#23
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,973 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,623 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.