↓ Skip to main content

Generic and therapeutic substitution: ethics meets health economics

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
Generic and therapeutic substitution: ethics meets health economics
Published in
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, March 2011
DOI 10.1007/s11096-011-9500-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Steven Simoens

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 28%
Student > Bachelor 4 16%
Researcher 3 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Other 5 20%
Unknown 2 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 28%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 16%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 12%
Chemistry 3 12%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 3 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2019.
All research outputs
#7,535,755
of 22,992,311 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
#467
of 1,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,885
of 109,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
#5
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,992,311 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,100 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,169 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.