| Title |
Cost of vitamin A and iron supplementation to “at risk” population
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Indian Journal of Pediatrics, November 1998
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02831346 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
C. S. Pandav, K. Anand, Sanjeev Gupta, G. V. S. Murthy |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 14% |
| Professor | 4 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 10% |
| Researcher | 3 | 10% |
| Other | 8 | 28% |
| Unknown | 3 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 24% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 14% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 10% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 7% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 17% |
| Unknown | 6 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2012.
All research outputs
#4,933,833
of 23,674,309 outputs
Outputs from Indian Journal of Pediatrics
#117
of 1,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,785
of 35,488 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Indian Journal of Pediatrics
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,674,309 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,596 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 35,488 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them