↓ Skip to main content

Changes in some antinutrients of cowpeas (Vigna unguiculata) processed with ‘kanwa’ alkaline salt

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Foods for Human Nutrition, October 1990
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Changes in some antinutrients of cowpeas (Vigna unguiculata) processed with ‘kanwa’ alkaline salt
Published in
Plant Foods for Human Nutrition, October 1990
DOI 10.1007/bf02193848
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stella G. Uzogara, Ian D. Morton, John W. Daniel

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 18%
Student > Bachelor 2 12%
Researcher 2 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 18%
Engineering 2 12%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 6%
Physics and Astronomy 1 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2012.
All research outputs
#7,535,755
of 22,992,311 outputs
Outputs from Plant Foods for Human Nutrition
#257
of 704 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,564
of 16,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Foods for Human Nutrition
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,992,311 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 704 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 16,012 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them