You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Re-evaluation of the widal agglutination test in response to the changing pattern of typhoid fever in the highlands of Papua New Guinea
|
---|---|
Published in |
Acta Tropica, September 1994
|
DOI | 10.1016/0001-706x(94)90071-x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
A. Clegg, M. Passey, M. Omena, K. Karigifa, N. Suve |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 28 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 6 | 21% |
Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 14% |
Student > Master | 3 | 10% |
Lecturer | 2 | 7% |
Other | 7 | 24% |
Unknown | 3 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 31% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 17% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 14% |
Unspecified | 3 | 10% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 7% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Unknown | 4 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2023.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Acta Tropica
#814
of 3,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,125
of 19,917 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Tropica
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,515 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 19,917 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.