↓ Skip to main content

A modified Kakwani measure for health inequality

Overview of attention for article published in Health Economics Review, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
A modified Kakwani measure for health inequality
Published in
Health Economics Review, May 2012
DOI 10.1186/2191-1991-2-10
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mototsugu Fukushige, Noriko Ishikawa, Satoko Maekawa

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Bangladesh 1 3%
Switzerland 1 3%
Unknown 35 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 19%
Student > Master 6 16%
Professor 5 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Researcher 3 8%
Other 8 22%
Unknown 5 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 16 43%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 11%
Social Sciences 3 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Mathematics 2 5%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 6 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2015.
All research outputs
#7,535,755
of 22,992,311 outputs
Outputs from Health Economics Review
#140
of 435 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,582
of 164,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Economics Review
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,992,311 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 435 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,260 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.